Across the country, community corrections agencies and courts are leaning more on tech to make protective orders stick in Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) cases. One of the biggest shifts? Pairing personal safety apps with court-mandated electronic monitoring. It’s already reshaping what protection looks and feels like for at-risk individuals.
How State Policy Handles Electronic Monitoring
Some states—Connecticut and New York, for example, now require GPS tracking for certain IPV cases, especially when there’s a clear danger of repeat contact. The goal is to catch issues before they happen, not after the fact, and provide those at risk with tools they can use immediately. See NY State Senate for more details.
What Role Do Personal Safety Apps Play?
Think of these apps as a vital lifeline, keeping the at-risk individual aware of the monitored individual’s proximity to their own location. If a monitored individual gets too close to a restricted area, the app immediately sends an alert to the at-risk person. That real-time warning empowers users to act, whether it’s reaching out for help, informing friends, or moving somewhere to another location.
This instant, reliable communication is more than just convenient. It gives people a sense of control and reassurance at critical moments. Solutions like BI Notifi® are providing fast, dependable alerts to help users feel safer and more confident as they go about their day.
Why Are More Agencies Choosing Personal Safety Apps?
Some areas are required by law, while others are opting to integrate these systems because it just makes sense. Here’s why:
- Alerts come through instantly, so it’s easier to act fast and document what happened.
- With automatic notifications, officers can prioritize their caseloads without leaving at-risk individuals waiting.
- Real-time information helps people make important decisions on the spot, instead of second guessing or reacting late.
- Supporting both iOS and Android devices means more people can use these tools, regardless of what phone they own.
What the Numbers Say
Recent peer-reviewed research shows that GPS monitoring is more effective in reducing repeat offenses than traditional community supervision, especially for individuals considered at higher risk.
A major evaluation of California’s GPS supervision program found that people monitored by GPS had significantly lower rates of returning to custody for parole violations or new criminal activity than those under traditional oversight. The reductions in repeat offenses in these studies generally ranged from about 26% to 38%, depending on the type of outcome measured (OJP.gov).
These results are echoed in a 2016 study, which found that individuals under GPS supervision across different jurisdictions were less likely to be re-arrested or reincarcerated compared to those supervised by older methods. This further reinforces GPS technology’s value in community supervision (Taylor & Francis).
A newer study from 2024 supports these findings, reporting that GPS monitoring serves as a useful tool for lowering the risk of repeated criminal behavior, though the exact reduction rates can differ depending on factors like location and population served (SAGE Journals).
Taken together, these peer-reviewed studies indicate that GPS monitoring leads to substantial reductions in repeat offenses compared to traditional community supervision, with decreases typically reported in the 26–38% range.
The policy message is clear: making sure these apps are simple enough for anyone to use must be a top priority. Equal access, privacy, and hands-on training are themes that show up repeatedly in the latest recommendations.
What’s Next?
Personal safety apps and electronic monitoring are becoming standard parts of the playbook for IPV cases. Having options, like BI Notifi, that run on both major mobile platforms is turning into a must-have, not an afterthought.
Learn More About BI Notifi
Download the fact sheet to explore full product specifications.
Schedule a product demo.